Summary:
- This article discusses the ongoing debate around the peer review process in scientific publishing. Peer review is the process where scientific papers are evaluated by other experts in the field before being published.
- The article highlights concerns that the peer review process can be opaque and biased, with some researchers calling for more transparency by making the peer review files publicly available.
- Proponents argue that open peer review could help improve the quality and integrity of scientific research, while critics worry it could lead to harassment of reviewers or discourage honest feedback.