Summary:

- The article argues that there is no solid scientific basis for the "degrowth" movement, which advocates for a planned reduction in economic output and consumption to address environmental and social issues.

- The author contends that degrowth lacks empirical evidence and relies on questionable assumptions, such as the feasibility of reducing economic activity without causing significant hardship and the ability to accurately measure well-being beyond GDP.

- The article suggests that a more pragmatic approach would be to focus on improving the quality of growth, such as by investing in renewable energy, sustainable practices, and social welfare, rather than pursuing a deliberate reduction in economic activity.