1. Twitter's content moderation system has been criticized for disproportionately censoring the term "cisgender" compared to actual slurs and hate speech. The article cites data from the Twitter Transparency Center, which shows that the word "cisgender" was censored more than any other term, including racial slurs and homophobic language.

2. The article suggests that this disparity in content moderation highlights a broader issue of bias and a lack of nuance in Twitter's approach to moderating LGBTQ+ related content. It argues that the censorship of the term "cisgender" is particularly problematic, as it is a common and important term used to describe individuals whose gender identity matches the sex they were assigned at birth.

3. The article also notes that the overmoderation of LGBTQ+ terminology on social media platforms can have negative consequences, such as limiting the ability of LGBTQ+ individuals to discuss and express their identities. It calls for a more thoughtful and inclusive approach to content moderation that recognizes the importance of LGBTQ+ language and avoids disproportionately targeting these terms.