hold the oral arguments in the Gonzalez and Taamneh cases. And he notes, as we have in the past, that the attacks on Section 230 from both parties are almost entirely about trying to control the internet for their own benefits:What they have in common is that both sides want to increase the government’s ability to control perhaps the most influential communications medium that has ever existed—a rare instance of bipartisan agreement. For one thing I don’t think that’s a good social policy (Bhattacharya turned out to be right about a great deal) but also labeling him “misinformation” without real cause probably should be actionable