major cases involving big technology companies, with key aspects of the internet on the line with its rulings later this year. What does Twitter argue?The core facts of these cases are very similar, so it's a very similar argument, which is that the statute, Section 2333 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, should not be read to allow liability for such a tenuous connection between the speech platform's activity and the actual terrorism. What is your overall concern for the outcome of these two cases?My general worry is that we don't want the internet companies to police our speech in ways that are simply because of liability concerns