According to Reuters, ChatGPT “generates sophisticated, human-like responses based on requests from users and mountains of data, including from legal texts.” An ABAJournal.com story said ChatGPT-3.5 “has the uncanny ability to generate incredibly detailed responses that even incorporate the requested tone or perspective, whether it’s drafting social media posts, a college essay or an oddly specific folk song.”ChatGPT didn’t pass the overall bar exam, according to a Dec. 31 paper describing the OpenAI chatbot’s performance by Daniel Martin Katz, a professor at the Chicago Kent College of Law, and Michael Bommarito, a professor at the Michigan State University College of Law.But others, such as Andrew Perlman, dean of the Suffolk University Law School, said tools such as ChatGPT can be put to good use, according to Reuters.When Perlman tried out ChatGPT, he asked it to complete a series of tasks, including drafting deposition questions and explaining why the U.S. Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage should not be overturned, according to a prior story by Reuters.Perlman said the bot “isn’t ready for prime time.” But according to Reuters, there were the makings of an advocate in its response to the same-sex marriage question.The bot talked about equal protection of the law and the fundamental right to marry, citing Loving v. Virginia."