He set out an array of concerns about children using the platforms, including the lack of separation between children and adults, how algorithms feed more potentially dangerous material to children, and the absence of robust age verification.But those tragedies don’t translate to change at boardroom level.”Meta’s letter mentioned Molly’s name only in its very first paragraph – a trend Mr Russell claimed he had noticed in a previous interview given by Mark Zuckerberg, its founder.“I remember an interview Mark Zuckerberg did in Dublin several years ago now and one of the questions that came up was about Molly.Yet it remains very uncertain that the proposed law will properly protect children and prevent technology giants, such as Meta, promoting content to children which normalises feelings of self-hate, encourages them to conceal how they feel and turn away from real-world sources of help – content which Meta did not accept during the inquest into Molly’s death was harmful for a child.”She added: “At a time when mental health services are under considerable pressure, it is clear that more must be done to address online harms children are being exposed to – in particular, the promotion and availability of harmful content on social media platforms.”Sources close to Michelle Donelan, the Culture Secretary, said: “Michelle continues to engage with MPs on what’s workable.But she has a reputation for working constructively with colleagues, and if you look at her track record, she always takes a balanced approach to get things over the line.”Elsewhere, Sir Bill Cash supported plans to jail tech bosses for up to two years if they fail to protect children from harmful online content."