The employees are Nick Clegg (Meta’s vice president of global policy), Nicola Mendelsohn (vice president of the global business team), and Cristian Perrella (whom Yahoo Finance reported is Meta’s European safety director).The document allegedly shows that Fenix wired money to Clegg, Mendelsohn, and Perrella, suggesting that these wire transfers provided evidence that the Meta employees accepted bribes.In the court filing, Fenix also pointed out that plaintiffs have accused Perrella, but in their complaint, plaintiffs say that wire transfers allegedly sent to Perrella were sent to someone with a similar name at “Cristian Peralta Trust.” Meta told Ars that because plaintiffs haven’t produced plausible evidence that the bribery occurred, the tech company is still joining OnlyFans in asking the court to dismiss the claims."Plaintiffs haven't identified a shred of evidence, and these allegations have been previously dismissed in federal court,” a Meta spokesperson told Ars, suggesting that news reports should not take the lawsuit seriously.After reviewing court documents and transcripts, Gizmodo’s Dell Cameron concluded that Meta’s “lawyers are less focused on proving the allegations false than arguing, even if true, that Meta would still be immune.” Cameron cited a prior Meta motion that seemed to downplay the company’s involvement, suggesting that even if Clegg, Mendelsohn, and Perrella were bribed, all that plaintiffs are alleging happened is that “high-ranking” Meta employees “went rogue” and then covered their tracks so that “Meta could not learn of their aberrant behavior.”OnlyFans similarly argued that the allegations are “meritless,” which, Cameron noted, “is not to say untrue.” From a September 8 court transcript, Cameron also highlighted an exchange in court between federal judge William Alsup and an OnlyFans attorney."